News

Save the Fish

Millstone Power Station is looking to renew its water discharge permit, which would allow for the continuation of mass fish-killing

Comments (3)
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Courtesy of Millstone
Millstone Power Station runs off a water discharge permit that expired in 1997

Millstone built us a new bridge. Millstone replaced the leaky roof on our food pantry. Millstone built a playscape for disabled kids.

From some of the testimony last week, you'd hardly know that the Millstone nuclear power plant was up for a water discharge permit and not the Rotary Club's corporate citizenship award.

Elected leaders lined up to gush about what a great neighbor the nuke plant is. How they lease the East Lyme police station to the town for $1 a year. How they dropped $100,000 on a new roof for the United Way Food Center. How they bought a new vehicle for the town dog catcher.

After a while, it started to sound like a recitation of how an out-of-state energy giant bought and sold local officialdom.

Millstone isn't up for the good neighbor award. It's seeking to renew its water discharge permit, a license to suck 2.2 billion gallons of water a day from Niantic Bay to cool its reactors, then flush it back into Long Island Sound 10 to 20 degrees warmer.

The process kills billions of fish and fish eggs. They're swallowed and pulverized by pumps, devastating what was once a vital habitat for winter flounder and other species.

Environmental groups want the state to make Millstone install a closed-loop cooling system that recycles water and could reduce fish kills by 98 percent.

Town officials who testified at a hearing in Old Lyme last week paid lip service to the fish, but waxed lyrical about the good deeds of Millstone and its corporate owner, Dominion of Virginia. And about how forcing them to build more eco-friendly cooling towers could totally ruin their views from the beach.

*

Millstone Power Station's been running off a water discharge permit that expired in 1997. Under the federal Clean Water Act, power plants must renew permits every five years. That ensures they stay current with evolving technologies and clean water regulations.

The state Department of Environmental Protection has allowed Millstone to run using an "emergency" permit for the past 11 years. That essentially gives them a "license to pollute," according to Roger Reynolds, senior attorney with Connecticut Fund for the Environment.

"An old permit is a license to use outdated, environmentally destructive technology," Reynolds says. "This is rich tidal water with billions of organisms being sucked up and killed each and every day. This needs to be addressed."

Millstone's two working reactors generate 2,100 megawatts of power, enough to power 500,000 million homes here and around New England. Two years ago, the DEP issued a tentative approval of Millstone's permit renewal which included a cost-benefit analysis that weighed how much a closed-loop cooling system would cost the nuclear plant against its ecological benefits. The environmentalists cried foul.

"That's very subjective," Reynolds says. "How do you value fish?"

A federal appeals court agreed, ruling that state environmental agencies can not factor in cost-benefit analyses when determining what is the "best technology available." That allowed two state environmental groups, Soundkeeper and Connecticut Fund for the Environment's Save the Sound program, to broker a deal with Millstone and the state in September that finally sets a deadline for all the studies to be done and the state environmental commissioner to make a ruling: Jan. 1, 2012. That might seem like a long ways off (how many billions of fish will have been ground to bits by then?), but Reynolds says it beats the alternative.

"Studies tend to drag on for 10 years," he says. "We thought we would win if we litigated, but that would take three years and probably we'd get a court order telling DEP to hurry up. So we did a settlement."

Perhaps more important than the time line is the upshot of the deal: Whatever technology the study identifies as the "best available" must be installed, regardless of cost to the nuke plant. Reynolds says he's extremely confident it will be a more eco-friendly closed-loop system and confident the state will hold Millstone to it. If they don't, Reynolds promises a court battle.

*

Elected leaders of the towns around Millstone are squarely behind the plant's permit application, albeit for decidedly non-environmental reasons.

And why shouldn't they be? Aside from being the largest employer and taxpayer in the immediate area, Millstone acts like a shadow government, handing out money for all manner of public projects.

Millstone owns the building that houses the East Lyme police department and leases it to the town for the cut rate of $1 a year. Millstone paid for a new bridge on Brainaird Road in East Lyme, and apparently some of its employees even helped construct it. Millstone bought East Lyme and Waterford a specialized vehicle for the animal control officer. Millstone donated $100,000 on a roof at the food panty and donated cash to build a playground.

All these deeds, and more, were the centerpiece of testimony by a half dozen elected officials and business leaders who stood at the microphone and told the state's environmental watchdog agency, essentially, that corporate citizenship alone should permit Millstone to profit off outdated, environmentally insensitive equipment.

When they were done with that, some of them trashed the idea of 500-foot cooling tower, only one of several less-destructive options for cooling the reactors with less harm to the eco-system.

East Lyme First Selectman Paul Formica said Simpsons-style cooling towers would create "a visual catastrophe."

"The constant release of steam that they emit will frighten witnesses who may misconstrue that steam as radiation vapors," Formica says. "Imagine the phone calls!" Shoreline leaders love their nuclear power, it would seem, so long as its destructive power only harms fish and not their vistas.

It took a woman of the cloth, Rev. Cynthia Willauer of the United Church of Christ, to point out the error of that logic. "The fish don't care about the aesthetics of the cooling tower," Willauer said at the meeting. "It doesn't matter to the fish."

Comments (3)
Post a Comment
It appears that the local municipalities have benefited more so than the rest of us from Millstone. First Selectman Paul Fomica only concern is for the views of his electorate while a marine ecological catastrophe has played out for the rest of us on Long Island Sound. Besides new cooling technology won't require 500 foot towers.
Posted by Terry on 12.9.08 at 17.56
A few points- The steam does contain radiation, sometimes a lot of radiation. A "shadow" government run by people the public can't elect is the definition of fascism. It isn't worth the playgrounds and dogmobiles. Forward thinkers realize that nuclear and fossil power is killing our planet and must be replaced by clean renewable sources. If the choice is between hideous gargantuan towers or closing the plant, I'm sure the plant will be closed. What are the other options? A typo: 500 thousand homes, not 500 thousand million 500 billion, the number of baby fish killed every year.
Posted by Dave Channon on 12.10.08 at 3.22
Delta Cooling Towers is a manufacturer of High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) cooling towers, air strippers, and water storage tanks and I am looking for representation in your marketplace.

Delta Cooling Towers are made from a CORROSION PROOF engineered plastic. The cooling tower shell will never rust, flake, chip, peel or ever need painting or protective coatings applied. Delta believes its towers are the future of the industry. Metal towers do not have the long-term corrosion protection advantages for outdoor usage. The galvanizing or other metal treatments only delay the corrosion of the underlying, often thin gauge sheet metal.

Delta manufactures a totally SEAMLESS cooling tower. Delta towers are the only large packaged cooling towers in the industry that have a “one-piece” shell. This means there are no seems, panels, rivets or hundreds of fasteners to fail or compromise the performance or integrity of the product.

Delta stands behind its products with the best warranty in the industry. Delta provides a 15-YEAR WARRANTY on the cooling towers structural shell. In addition, Delta’s cooling tower motors have a 5-year warranty.

Delta Cooling Towers are LOW MAINTENANCE by design. Delta has carefully designed its products to have minimal maintenance issues. Other manufacturers of cooling towers have much more complicated designs to achieve the same performance. This includes many more parts – which are more potential maintenance or require the maintenance of other towers. On Delta towers there are no gear reducers, couplings, additional shafts, or extra bearings to maintain.

Delta prides itself on exceptional CUSTOMER SERVICE. Our “can-do” mindset allows us to meet or exceed any customer’s cooling tower requirements. We offer many product options and can provide any accessories associated with cooling towers. www.deltacooling.com
Posted by Tom Ryder on 12.11.08 at 8.00
Leave this field empty Name*:

Email*:

URL:

Comment:

All comments must adhere to our Terms & Conditions of Use.

Find it Here:
keyword:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

We Are Holden Caulfield
Development is Such Sweet Sorrow
Greenwich Goes to the Dogs
Down A Rat Hole?
The state steps in with $20 million to pay for work a private developer was supposed to do on the new Fairfield train station
False Victory
Obama has a "mission accomplished" moment in the war on the economy
Cuts Too Close
Academic Panel
'It's Different When It's You'
A state official. A Massachusetts cop. Threatening text messages. What happens when the person who's supposed to give voice to victims becomes a victim?